<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en">
  <title>Dead Sea Scrolls Controversy in San Diego</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dead_sea_scrolls_controversy.sandiegoblogs.com/" />
  <modified>2007-11-22T05:28:27Z</modified>
  <tagline>You can change this blog description in your editing menu by clicking Weblog Config and then Preferences.</tagline>
  <id>tag:,2008:/25</id>
  <generator url="http://www.movabletype.org/" version="2.661">Movable Type</generator>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2007, Charles Gadda</copyright>
  <entry>
    <title>Did Christian agenda lead to biased Dead Sea Scrolls exhibit in San Diego?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dead_sea_scrolls_controversy.sandiegoblogs.com/archives/000620.html" />
    <modified>2007-11-22T05:28:27Z</modified>
    <issued>2007-11-22T00:28:27-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:,2007:/25.620</id>
    <created>2007-11-22T05:28:27Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">&quot;The truth is, I wouldn&apos;t classify these as Jewish texts....&quot;Curator of Dead Sea Scrolls exhibit, San Diego Natural History Museum, speaking on June 2, 2007 Please note: this is a revised version of an article that originally appeared on October...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Charles Gadda</name>
      
      <email>carlogadda@yahoo.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://dead_sea_scrolls_controversy.sandiegoblogs.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><FONT size=3><I>"The truth is, I wouldn't classify these as Jewish texts...."<BR><BR>Curator of Dead Sea Scrolls exhibit, San Diego Natural History Museum, speaking on June 2, 2007</I></FONT><BR><br />
<I>Please note: this is a revised version of an article that originally appeared on October 2, 2007, on the NowPublic site.</I><BR><BR>Was it appropriate for a scientific institution to allow a group of Christian academics to impose their agenda on an exhibit of ancient documents taking place under its auspices? Given what happened with the <B>Dead Sea Scrolls</B> exhibit currently taking place at the San Diego <B>Natural History Museum</B>, this question confronts those of us who are concerned with issues of science, religion and ethics in American society.<BR><BR>Take a look at the <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.twu.ca/academics/graduate/biblical/dead-sea-institute.html" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.twu.ca/academics/graduate/biblical/dead-sea-institute.html">program</A> of the "Dead Sea Scrolls Institute" at <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.twu.ca/governance/office/strategic-direction/educational-vitality.html" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.twu.ca/governance/office/strategic-direction/educational-vitality.html">Trinity Western </A><A href="http://www.twu.ca/governance/office/strategic-direction/educational-vitality.html">University</A> (which, as its name and website description indicate, is a Christian establishment). The program states: "We believe that Evangelical Christian scholars should play a <B>significant role</B> in the study of the Dead Sea Scrolls." Well, the Institute's co-director, <B>Martin Abegg</B>, did indeed play a "significant role" in creating the exhibit of the scrolls that took place last year at the Pacific Science Center in Seattle, even to the point of acting as Governor Christine Gregoire's "personal guide" on her tour of the exhibit; and there can be little doubt that he was involved in the creation of the current San Diego exhibit too -- as indicated, for example, in his role as a "featured commentator" on the exhibit's audio tour.<BR><BR>It is thus not surprising to learn that, in an <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/articles/2007/06/02/news/01kohn060207.txt" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/articles/2007/06/02/news/01kohn060207.txt">interview</A> of June 2, 2007, the <B>curator</B> of the San Diego exhibit, Dr. <B>Risa Levitt Kohn</B>, stated:<BR><BR>"The truth is, I wouldn't classify these as Jewish texts... Because I would say Judaism, the way we tend to think about it, even early Judaism, is not yet fully crystallized in this period...."<BR><BR>While flowing naturally from the views of Abegg and a number of other individuals whose names are listed below, Kohn's statement was, unfortunately, tendentious; and it was particularly inappropriate coming from the curator of a supposedly scientific Dead Sea Scrolls exhibit. After all, the scrolls are mostly Hebrew and Aramaic manuscripts dating from a time when the civilization commonly known as "intertestamental Judaism" flourished in Palestine. What is more, an important group of historians and archaeologists have argued, both from the actual contents of the texts and from the results of the excavations of the past decade, that the scrolls are specifically the remains of <I>Jewish</I> libraries in Jerusalem, removed to multiple locations in the desert for safekeeping shortly before or during the Roman siege and sacking of the city in 70 A.D. <BR><BR>The evidence supporting this <I>Jewish</I> view (treated, let us recall, as one of the two salient theories of scroll origins in the Cambridge History of <I>Judaism</I>) is <B>concealed</B> in the San Diego exhibit, which favors the so-called "Qumran-Essene" theory according to which the scrolls were written, not by multiple groups of Jews living in a major urban center, but by a radical sect (or "community") imagined, without any supporting archaeological proof, to have been living in a military fortress and commercial entrepot in the desert. What is more, all of the Jerusalem theory's proponents have been <B>excluded from participating</B> in the lecture series accompanying the exhibit. Thus, none of the proponents of the <I>Jewish</I> view will have the opportunity to publicly challenge Dr. Kohn's assertion concerning the <I>non</I>-Jewish character of the scrolls. <BR><BR>We must note, moreover, that in the same interview, Dr. Kohn asserted that she studied the scrolls only in a "tangential" way, thereby contradicting her earlier written statement of January 9, 2007, to the effect that she is a "Dead Sea Scrolls scholar." <BR><BR>Bearing these assertions of Dr. Kohn's in mind, let us now turn to the religious background, training and affiliations of the five key individuals who -- in addition, of course, to the above-cited Martin Abegg -- are known to have been involved in the creation of the San Diego exhibit (for full details and links, see my article on <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.nowpublic.com/node/582470" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.nowpublic.com/node/582470">Christian fundamentalism and the Dead Sea Scrolls in San Diego</A>, archived here directly below): <BR><br />
<LI><B>David Noel Freedman</B>: Presbyterian minister since 1944, biblical scholar and member of the original team that monopolized the Dead Sea Scrolls for many years; Risa Levitt Kohn's professor at UCSD; co-author, with Pam Fox Kuhlken, of a popular book on the scrolls whose publication was timed to coincide with the exhibit (I will have a word to say about this book below).<BR></LI><br />
<LI><B>Weston Fields</B>: Th.D. from "Grace Theological Seminary," Ph.D. in biblical studies from Hebrew University; affiliated with Christian fundamentalist "University of the Holy Land" network; connected with Freedman and other members of the old monopoly team, through the "Dead Sea Scrolls Foundation" of which he is the director; sells Dead Sea Scrolls ties. <BR></LI><br />
<LI><B>Russell Fuller</B>: professor in the Theology department at the University of San Diego, which (despite its name) is a "Roman Catholic institution" with a declared religious mission. His recent lecture at the museum was sponsored by "Point Loma Nazarene University," which aims to become a "nationally prominent Christian university."<BR></LI><br />
<LI><B>William Schniedewind</B>: B.A. and M.A. from two Christian educational institutions ("George Fox University" and "Jerusalem University College," which was the predecessor of the "Institute of Holy Land Studies"); Ph.D. from Brandeis; biblical scholar at UCLA; described in one news item as a "practicing Christian with a deep appreciation of Judaism"; until recently listed as adjunct professor and member of board of advisors on personnel page of the "University of the Holy Land"; apparently no longer affiliated with that institution. <BR></LI><br />
<LI><B>Robert Cargill</B>: Schniedewind's graduate student at UCLA, holds both a Master of Science in Christian Ministry and a Master of Divinity degree from Pepperdine University (a Christian educational institution affiliated with the Churches of Christ).  An article that appeared on a Jewish website two weeks before the San Diego exhibit opened, and for which he was interviewed, states merely that while at Pepperdine he majored in "biblical studies" -- a very interesting way of describing those two degrees -- and quotes him as stating that he "realized that to understand Christianity I had to first understand Judaism."</LI><br />
<BR>These five individuals have, both separately and in tandem, <B>(1)</B> taught Risa Levitt Kohn at UCSD and recommended her as curator to the museum; <B>(2)</B> arranged for the scrolls to come to San Diego; <B>(3)</B> served as consultant(s) to the museum's exhibit; <B>(4)</B> defended the old Qumran-Essene theory of Dead Sea Scroll origins in a variety of articles that ignore the major archaeological research developments of the past decade and feature titles like "Qumran Hebrew as an Antilanguage"; and <B>(5)</B> created a misleading "virtual reality" film that carefully distorts current research on Qumran and is being shown at the exhibit. They have also <B>(6)</B> snitched the title of a book by one of the excluded scholars for a lecture at the museum attacking the excluded scholars' views; and <B>(7)</B> used the exhibit to promote their own books; engaged in sensationalist media campaigns designed to promote their own ideas as well as the exhibit; and remained utterly silent in face of criticism.<BR><BR>With respect to the above-mentioned popular book by <B>David Noel Freedman</B> and Pam Fox Kuhlken: timed, as I said, to coincide with the San Diego exhibit, and entitled What Are the Dead Sea Scrolls and Why Do They Matter?, it presents the Qumran-Essene theory in the manner of a dogma, without even informing readers of the existence of historical and archaeological research to the contrary. One passage, narrated in an earnest tone, suggests that the "secrecy" of the famous scrolls monopoly was wrong -- but keeps it a secret from readers that Freedman himself was part of the monopoly. I am no expert, of course, on the ethical standards applicable to Presbyterian ministers, but shouldn't the ordinary standards of common human decency lead us to have slightly higher expectations from someone who received a Ph.D. and who, in fact, presents himself to the public as a serious scholar? Then again, I seem to recall that telling the truth never earned anyone a fortune.<BR><BR>In the case of Mr. <B>Cargill</B>, it must be emphasized that his work on the misleading "virtual reality" film being shown at the museum was inappropriately funded with $100,000 that the museum obtained from Stephen Spielberg's Holocaust fund. Why was a project of such importance entrusted to a graduate student with a ministerial degree from an institution affiliated with the Churches of Christ, rather than the group of seasoned Israeli archaeologists who, in 2006, published their detailed account of ten years spent re-examining Qumran? Is it because their on-site work led them to conclude that Qumran was a military fortress and commercial entrepot, that no sect ever lived there, and that the scrolls came from Jerusalem? <BR><BR>Was it fair to deny the San Diego public the opportunity to hear from those archaeologists, and instead expose 450,000 people to the speculative reasonings of a young man who hasn't even completed a doctoral dissertation? Was Stephen Spielberg fully aware of the manner in which the exhibitors intended to use his money? Did he know the information would <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/san_diego_virtual_reality_2007.pdf" target=_blank mce_href="http://oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/san_diego_virtual_reality_2007.pdf">eventually come out</A> that the film's author, in providing a list of "reasons" to mention a particular Israeli scholar in connection with the "theory" that Qumran was a fortress, would implicitly attribute the creation of that "theory" to the wrong scholar in a manner that is arguably defamatory; would indicate that mentioning the name "will shield us from criticism"; and would assert in writing: "There's a third reason, <STRONG>but I never write it down</STRONG>"? Are we to conclude that the museum suggested to the film's author that he <STRONG>not keep a written record of certain reasons</STRONG>? A fine comment on academic ethics and museum exhibits today!<BR><BR>Mention should also be made of the elaborate network of evangelical "Bible blogs" that have in essence advertised the San Diego exhibit free of charge. Take, for example, the case of <B><A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://drjimwest.wordpress.com/2007/09/18/nadias-naysayers/" target=_blank mce_href="http://drjimwest.wordpress.com/2007/09/18/nadias-naysayers/">Jim West</A></B> (Th.D. from Andersonville Theological Seminary in Georgia; currently a pastor in Petros, Tennessee). West has gone to considerable lengths to promote the above-mentioned "virtual reality" film, even using images from it (including the imaginary reconstruction of a "scriptorium" at Qumran which archaeologists now believe never existed) for his blog header. <BR><BR>Interestingly, West has also risen to the defense of <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/10/education/10barnard.html" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/10/education/10barnard.html">Nadia Abu el-Haj</A>, the Palestinian "sociologist" who is about to receive tenure from Columbia University despite (or indeed because of) her fashionably post-modernist claims to the effect that the abundant material evidence of a Jewish kingdom in ancient Palestine has been largely manufactured by Israeli archaeologists for political purposes. West (who has made his own "anti-Zionist" views clear in numerous postings) condemns Abu el-Haj's detractors on the basis that they have not attempted to "engage" with her. Yet he has had not a word to say about the San Diego museum's refusal to "engage" the prominent scholars who have rejected the theory of scroll origins defended in the current exhibit. Which is worse, various individuals failing to "engage" with Abu el-Haj on internet blogs, or a scientific institution violating the principle of free debate by excluding an entire group of major researchers from a six-million-dollar exhibit?<BR><BR>In addition to the individuals specifically responsible for creating and promoting the exhibit, we may add others who, in one way or another, appear to have been involved in other recent exhibits and/or in various sensationalist attempts to defend the traditional Qumran-Essene theory against the objections raised by the archaeologists of the past decade:<BR><br />
<LI><B>James Tabor</B> ("Lost Tomb of Jesus" and "Essene toilet" claims; professor in religion department in Charlotte, N.C.; former Worldwide Church of God member; listed as "resource" on [i.e., apologist for] "new religions" by Church of Scientology)</LI><br />
<LI><B>Joe Zias</B> (M.A. from Wayne State University; no Ph.D., but presents himself as "anthropologist"; Tabor's collaborator on "Essene toilet" claim; affiliated with "Jerusalem Institute for Biblical Exploration," a Christian fundamentalist outfit based in Tennessee; gives <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.joezias.com/lectures.html" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.joezias.com/lectures.html">lectures</A> on topics that include "crucifixion and the Dead Sea Scrolls" and "the monasteries of the Judean Desert and their role in preventing and containing infectious disease during the Early Christian period")</LI><br />
<LI><B>Randall Price</B> (World of Bible Ministries; adamant defender of Qumran-Essene theory) </LI><br />
<BR>Finally, with respect to David Noel Freedman, we must also mention some of his principal associates, past and present:<BR><br />
<LI><B>Father Roland de Vaux</B> (Dominican priest, now deceased; chief promoter of Qumran-Essene theory, member of original monopoly team) </LI><br />
<LI><B>Frank Cross</B> (Bachelor of Divinity from McCormick Theological Seminary, professor at Harvard Divinity School, member of original monopoly team; "co-wrote" Freedman's Ph.D. dissertation)</LI><br />
<LI><B>Pam Fox Kuhlken</B> (co-author with Freedman of the popular book on the scrolls mentioned above; ministerial degree from Bethel Seminary, founder of an on-line Christian "college") </LI><br />
<BR>This, of course, is only a partial list (among many others, one could add, e.g., the Dominicans of the Ecole Biblique in Jerusalem (one of whom will soon be lecturing at the San Diego museum), or people like <B>Stephen Pfann</B>, <B>David Bivin</B> and <B>Todd Bolen</B> of the "Holy Land" network; for details, see my "Christian Fundamentalism" article and the additional comments appended to it). <BR><BR>All of these people appear to share a conviction (whether it is based on <I>scientific</I> or <I>religious</I> grounds is subject to debate) that the "beliefs, literature and men of the Essene community" were a "vital part of the fabric of Jesus' world." In addition, given the programs of the institutions with which they are affiliated, it appears likely that at least some of them believe that on account of "disobedience ... Israel was temporarily set aside ... but will again be awakened through repentance to enter into the land of blessing." Such "repentance," of course, is Christian evangelical lingo for conversion of the Jews to Christianity. (See, again, the additional comments appended to my "Christian Fundamentalism" article for details). <BR><BR>At the same time, as indicated above, the evidence supporting the views of a group of important Jewish and Israeli historians and archaeologists who disagree with Freedman and his Christian colleagues has been belittled and excluded, the only explanation offered being that "<A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.nowpublic.com/node/525806" target=_blank mce_href="../../525806">you don't want to confuse people with so many competing theories</A>." The excluded scholars, who include University of Chicago historian <B>Norman Golb</B> along with <B>Rachel Elior</B> of the Hebrew University, <B>Yitzhak Magen</B>, <B>Yuval Peleg</B>, <B>Yizhar Hirschfeld</B> and others, believe that no Essenes lived at Qumran, that the Scrolls came from the Jewish capital and, as Golb phrased it in a <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.forward.com/articles/10497/" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.forward.com/articles/10497/">Forward editorial</A>, that the "complex history of the Palestinian Jews on the eve of the First Revolt is being pushed aside in favor of a bizarre, Christologically colored thesis." <BR><BR>Incidentally, Golb's review of the  <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/dss_review_sandiego_catalogue_2007.pdf" target=_blank mce_href="http://oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/dss_review_sandiego_catalogue_2007.pdf">museum's catalogue</A>, as well as his review of the "<A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/san_diego_virtual_reality_2007.pdf" target=_blank mce_href="http://oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/san_diego_virtual_reality_2007.pdf">virtual reality</A>" film funded by Spielberg and prepared by UCLA grad student Robert Cargill, expose an entire host of erroneous and mendacious statements in the museum's presentation and essentially place an enormous question mark over any remaining claim to scientific legitimacy that this exhibit may have had.  As of this date (November 22) the museum has as yet to offer any explanation of the exposed facts. <BR><BR>Returning to Risa Levitt Kohn, the curator of the exhibit [and author of the above-mentioned catalogue], one must bear in mind that she only recently completed her Ph.D., could well have difficult career choices to make and is probably (I'm happy to be corrected by her or others if I'm wrong) following orders or advice dished out by her mentor Dr. Freedman and the others. How could it be otherwise, given that she only has a "tangential" knowledge of the topic? One can certainly empathize with her on account of the difficulty she is in, but I don't see how that can excuse her conduct, which has contributed to a situation in which the two theories of scroll origins oddly continue to subsist side by side, in parallel universes, without any of the direct public exchanges that alone would allow people to judge for themselves whose arguments are more convincing. <BR><BR>I believe these facts speak for themselves. While there is certainly no easy answer to the question of why any of this "matters," what is now known surely gives rise to an <B>appearance of impropriety</B>. In sum, we appear to be dealing, at the very least, with an exhibition tainted by intellectual antisemitism, with an obscurantist, seemingly irrational fear of debate, and with biased conduct that is abhorrent to our basic social sentiments and to the principle of freedom of inquiry which lies at the core of our system of values. <BR><BR>What is more, the view being defended in the exhibit may well distort the true picture of the historical relationship between Judaism of the intertestamental period and early Christianity -- a topic that is of immense significance to many people. And the exhibitors were clearly worried that the possibility of such distortion might become known. Why else would they be afraid to invite the opponents of the view in question to explain their objections to the San Diego public?<BR><BR>So much for the exhibit itself. As was to be expected, a small number of rational, humanistically minded people have signaled my pieces in a favorable way, especially in England (I am truly grateful to the author of the <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.number80.co.uk/" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.number80.co.uk/">View from Number 80</A> blog); but several individuals, apparently associated in one way or another with the exhibit or with the theory defended in it, have attacked me here and there, both privately and publicly, accusing me of "playing the religion card," of being a "bigot," and (as it was put by Freedman's co-author Pam Fox Kuhlken in her dramatic intervention in the comments to my "Christian Fundamentalism" article) of establishing "guilt by association." (These accusations are repeated by the individual who has posted a series of lengthy attempts to defend the museum, replete with ad hominem attacks against me, in the comments below.)&nbsp;<BR><BR>Well, who are the bigots here? If a shopowner keeps saying "we're closed" when atheists, agnostics, or people of one religion or another show up, does a concerned observer "play the religion card" if he complains about this? Did I condemn the San Diego team members because of their affiliations, or did I not rather condemn their <I>conduct</I>? Did I ever say that proponents of the old Qumran-Essene theory should be <I>silenced in a six-million-dollar museum exhibit</I>? Did I blame David Noel Freedman for being a Presbyterian minister, or did I blame him rather for playing along with -- and profiting from -- an exhibition that stifles debate, excludes a group of major Jewish scholars, and misleads the public by presenting a fabricated Qumran-Essene "consensus" that no longer exists? <BR><BR>The San Diego exhibit, it must be said, is only the latest of a series of similarly vulgar and biased displays, all of them in "science" museums of one sort or another. It thus appears that the same <B>unscientific pattern of conduct</B> that we have seen here has been going on for at least several years in other venues. Yet, for a variety of reasons -- ranging, one can only presume, from general distaste to fear for one's career -- everyone has always delicately passed the matter over in silence. <BR><BR>As for me, I am glad to have set forth the basic facts for anyone to see, and will continue to hope that serious-minded people will think about the situation and draw whichever conclusions are the right ones.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Christian fundamentalism and the Dead Sea Scrolls in San Diego</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dead_sea_scrolls_controversy.sandiegoblogs.com/archives/000506.html" />
    <modified>2007-09-01T02:07:39Z</modified>
    <issued>2007-08-31T22:07:39-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:,2007:/25.506</id>
    <created>2007-09-01T02:07:39Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Is it proper for museums claiming scientific objectivity to sponsor exhibits significantly informed by fundamentalist beliefs? In fact, did the San Diego Natural History Museum even know that these various Christian organizations — all of which seem to be so oddly connected among themselves — were, together with members of the original Dead Sea Scrolls monopoly, behind the exhibit that Risa Levitt Kohn and Weston Fields pitched to them?Did they know that Kohn would collaborate with Fields to exclude a series of major Israeli archaeologists from the exhibit...? 
Did Joan and Irwin Jacobs, Stephen Spielberg and other famous donors know that of the millions of dollars they agreed to give for the exhibit, some would be handed over to graduate student (and Minister) Robert Cargill for a project that would be featured on the &quot;University of the Holy Land&quot; website; some would fund the &quot;continuing research&quot; of the old crew of Dead Sea Scrolls monopolists; and some would perhaps pad the pockets of the monopolists&apos; other &quot;righteous,&quot; i.e., fundamentalist collaborators? Would the donors have been so quick to shell out the money if they had known exactly who was asking for it?</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Charles Gadda</name>
      
      <email>carlogadda@yahoo.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://dead_sea_scrolls_controversy.sandiegoblogs.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img alt="fields tie.jpg" src="http://dead_sea_scrolls_controversy.sandiegoblogs.com/archives/fields tie.jpg" width="120" height="90" border="1" /><br />
<em>A scroll used on one of Weston Field's ties, as shown on his website</em></p>

<p><em>Please note: this article originally appeared on August 2, 2007, on the Nowpublic site.</em></p>

<p><P><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;It is generally known that the Dead Sea Scrolls exhibit taking place at the <B>San Diego Natural History Museum</B> has become submerged in a certain amount of controversy. Many people, however, are a bit confused as to what it's all about. Why on earth did it cost six million dollars to create this exhibit? And what's all the fuss about anyway? After all, it's just a bunch of old parchment texts, so who cares?<BR><BR>Hoping to shed some light on these matters, I decided to take a closer look at the history of this exhibit. What I found was evidence that the old Dead Sea Scrolls monopoly group (on which see further below) teamed up with individuals affiliated in one way or another with a number of Christian fundamentalist "educational institutions" to market the exhibit and control precisely what type of ideas would be presented in it.<BR><BR>So what do the "American Institute For Advanced Biblical Studies," "Grace College," the "Institute of Holy Land Studies," the "Jerusalem Institute for Biblical Exploration," the "Jerusalem University College," the "University of the Holy Land" and other similar institutions all have in common, and what do they have to do with the Dead Sea Scrolls? For the answer, read on. <BR><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;*<BR><BR>An article in the <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20050516/news_1n16scroll.html" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20050516/news_1n16scroll.html">San Diego Union-Tribune</A> sums up the basic facts as follows: "The exhibition's journey to San Diego began with a lunch and a phone call. David Noel Freedman, a well-known biblical scholar at the University of California San Diego," invited his former student Dr. Risa Levitt Kohn, now a faculty member at San Diego State University, "to meet <B>Weston Fields</B>, executive director of the Dead Sea Scrolls Foundation, which raises funds for publication and preservation through exhibitions. Levitt Kohn suggested the Natural History Museum as a possible venue."<BR><BR>Another website <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.jewishsightseeing.com/dhh_weblog/2006-blog/2006-01/2006-01-26-dead_sea_scrolls.htm" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.jewishsightseeing.com/dhh_weblog/2006-blog/2006-01/2006-01-26-dead_sea_scrolls.htm">similarly explains</A> that this mysterious Weston Fields, "head of the Dead Sea Scrolls Foundation, which raises money for continuing research into the scrolls, visited Freedman at UCSD while Levitt Kohn was completing her doctoral studies."<BR><BR>At first sight, all of this sounds very fine and simple. I've known for some time that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Noel_Freedman">David Noel Freedman</a> is a Presbyterian minister (although his <a href="http://qohelet.fatcow.com/">father</a> was Jewish) who wrote his "joint Ph.D. dissertation" with Frank Cross, another well-known defender of the old Qumran-Essene theory of the Dead Sea Scrolls. (They wrote the dissertation together and Johns Hopkins awarded a Ph.D. degree to each of them individually. I have never heard of any other case of degrees being handed out in such a manner by a humanities department, but we will pass over this little detail and whatever ethical issues it might raise.) Basically, Freedman and Kohn appear to be two typical American academics.<BR><BR>What was missing from the picture, was any kind of solid background info on the individual who appeared to be the animating force behind the San Diego exhibit: namely, <B>Weston Fields</B>, "executive director" of the <B>Dead Sea Scrolls Foundation</B>. Who is this guy, and why would he be having lunch with Freedman and soon-to-be Dr. Kohn at UCLA? That's the question I started with, and from that point on a whole picture began to emerge.<BR><BR>Here is what I found on Fields:<BR><BR>"<A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.brill.nl/print.aspx?partid=10&amp;pid=25993" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.brill.nl/print.aspx?partid=10&amp;pid=25993">Weston W. Fields, Ph.D.</A>, has been Executive Director of the Dead Sea Scrolls Foundation in Jerusalem since 1991. He taught at <B>Grace College and Theological Seminary</B> for ten years and at the <B>Institute of Holy Land Studies</B> (now <B>Jerusalem University College</B>) for seven years." Another website presents him as "<A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.pacsci.org/lectures/" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.pacsci.org/lectures/">Weston W. Fields, Th.D., Ph.D.</A> — Executive Director, The Dead Sea Scrolls Foundation; Chair, Department of Biblical Studies; Chair, Division of Old Testament and Culture of Ancient Israel, <B>University of the Holy Land</B>, Jerusalem."<BR><BR>Well, let's take these institutions one by one.<BR><BR>First, <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.grace.edu/" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.grace.edu/"><B>Grace College</B></A>: located in the "resort community of Winona Lake, near Warsaw, Indiana," it is "associated with the Fellowship of Grace Brethren Churches" and defines itself as an "evangelical Christian community of higher education which applies Biblical values...." Its webpage includes the statement: "Our goal in Christian living and teaching is to make Christ preeminent in all things." It further indicates that "Grace College affirms the <B>inerrancy of scripture </B>and the moral, spiritual, and historical authority of the Bible, embracing sound theology, including the divine creation of the universe and other great doctrines."<BR><BR>Second, the <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.aihls.org/" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.aihls.org/"><B>Institute of Holy Land Studies</B></A>: based in Sherwood, Arkansas, it is also known as the "American Institute For Advanced Biblical Studies." Founded by Dr. Ron Moseley in 1991 as a "specialty college," it serves as a "training center for biblical teachers and laymen relating to Middle Eastern history." Its "Statement of Faith" explains that its program gives "special emphasis to the Christian faith <B>as it was originally conceived</B>..., refuting and denying all atheistic, agnostic, pagan, and neo-scientific alterations of the Scriptures. We affirm ... the creation of man by the act of God, the incarnation and virgin birth of Jesus of Nazareth as the Jewish Messiah. We affirm His vicarious atonement for the sins of the world, by shedding of the Messiah's blood on the cross as the innocent for the unjust and the resurrection of His body from the tomb..." Apparently, the Institute, or at least its Jerusalem branch, goes by a third name as well: the "<STRONG>Jerusalem University College</STRONG>"; but this place has a different website and a slightly different "<A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.juc.edu/about/faith.asp" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.juc.edu/about/faith.asp">faith statement</A>" which refers to the principles of the <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.juc.edu/schools/faith.htm" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.juc.edu/schools/faith.htm">National Association of Evangelicals</A>. (These two links only seem to work periodically; at any rate they simply contain more of the same kind of stuff.)<BR><BR>Third, the <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.uhl.ac/index.html" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.uhl.ac/index.html"><B>University of the Holy Land</B></A>: its online "academic profile" states that it was "developed" in 1986 by the "Center for the Study of Early Christianity." It offers, among other degrees, a Master of Theological Studies "designed for students desiring to enter into ministerial areas of vocation." Its website includes a page soliciting financial contributions that can be sent to an address in Medford, Oregon. One of its projects involves the construction of a model "Nazareth Village" the aim of which is to "provide a sort of time capsule into which the contemporary visitor might step to <B>encounter more effectively the message of Jesus in its original setting</B>."&nbsp;<BR><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;*<BR><BR>So far so good. If the only element of my story were Weston Fields and his illustrious teaching career, well, then perhaps it would not be much of a story. Field's affiliations, however, are only the beginning of the story.<BR><BR>It turns out that one distinguished member of the <B>University of the Holy Land</B>'s <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.uhl.ac/personnel/" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.uhl.ac/personnel/">adjunct faculty and board of advisors</A>, is Dr. <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Schniedewind" target=_blank mce_href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Schniedewind">William Schniedewind</A>, a biblical scholar who teaches at UCLA, and whose views on the Scrolls and Khirbet Qumran are being displayed in a "virtual reality" film at the San Diego exhibit. And where did Dr. Schniedewind receive his M.A.? At the <STRONG>Jerusalem University College</STRONG> (see above).<BR><BR>Here a digression is necessary, because we read further that "the founder and President of the <STRONG>University of the Holy Land</STRONG>/Center for the Study of Early Christianity is Dr. <B>Stephen J. Pfann</B>." We are informed that Pfann received his M.A. (in what year is not clear) from the Graduate Theological Union in Berkeley; he has lived in Jerusalem since 1982; in 2001, he received his Ph.D. from the Hebrew University, the topic of his dissertation being "The Character of the Essene Movement in Light of the Manuscripts in Esoteric Script from Qumran"; nine years earlier, however, he was made a member of the official "<B>International Team of Editors</B>" of the Dead Sea Scrolls — a group that was set up during the old days of the Scrolls monopoly (on which more below). Pfann, we are told, is a collaborator of <B>Emmanuel Tov</B>, the head of the International Team. I will have another word to say about Emmanuel Tov in a moment. <BR><BR>First, however, let us return to Weston Fields, the <I>primo mobile</I> behind the San Diego exhibit. I was unable to ascertain from what institution he received the Th.D and Ph.D. that he claims to have; nor is his name listed on the University of the Holy Land site despite the chair that he claims to hold there; but I took a closer look at his <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.deadseascrollsfoundation.com/index.htm" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.deadseascrollsfoundation.com/index.htm"><B>Dead Sea Scrolls Foundation</B></A>. Its website states that it "is involved in facilitating international exhibitions of scrolls, and serves as a <B>clearing house for many other matters</B> relating to scrolls research and scholarship." Its "<B>primary function</B>," however, "is the financial support of the official publication in the Oxford University Press series" of the Dead Sea Scrolls. The methods it uses to achieve these goals include the sale (no doubt in a variety of venues including museum exhibits) of "<A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.deadseascrollsfoundation.com/collection.htm" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.deadseascrollsfoundation.com/collection.htm">Dead Sea Scroll ties and scarves</A>."<BR><BR>Its board of advisors includes <B>David Noel Freedman</B>, the guy who shared (so to speak) a Ph.D. with Frank Cross, and whose student Risa Levitt Kohn is the curator of the San Diego exhibit; and its board of directors includes none other than... <B>Emmanuel Tov</B>, the mentor of Holy Land University founder <B>Stephen Pfann</B>. The foundation's other directors and advisors consist mainly of a series of other academicians, at least eleven of whom are members of the aforementioned "International Team of Editors", and all of whom are associated with the old theory that the Dead Sea Scrolls were written at Qumran by a radical sect known as the Essenes. <BR><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;*<BR><BR>Now does any of this sound familiar? Perhaps not, so for readers who might not know about the Dead Sea Scrolls <B>monopoly scandal</B> of the early 1990's, another small digression is in order. Somehow, back then, word slipped out that the official team of editors were hoarding hundreds of unpublished texts and refusing to allow anyone who was not a privileged member of their "official" group — and hence, anyone who disagreed with the old Qumran-Essene theory — to study them.<BR><BR><B>Emmanuel Tov</B> (yes, Stephen Pfann's mentor) was then appointed head of the International Team (which explains why Pfann, nine years before receiving his Ph.D. but six years after "developing" the University of the Holy Land, quickly became a member of the Team when seasoned scholars were complaining of being exluded from it). Around that time, despite widening public awareness of the scandal, a rather shoddy agreement was ironed out to sell photographs of the texts to Oxford University, under the condition that only people who were approved by the official team could see them. This led to a harsh exchange of letters in the <I>Times</I> of London between <B>Geza Vermes</B> of Oxford (who had in effect, through this agreement, purchased his way into becoming a member of the official editorial team) and University of Chicago historian <B>Norman Golb</B>, who condemned the agreement as an offense to the British tradition of academic freedom.<BR><BR>A few days later, <B>William Moffett</B>, director of the Huntington Library in California, saw the exchange of letters in the <I>Times.</I> It so happened that many years before, under a highly unusual arrangement, a wealthy citizen of California had succeeded in purchasing a complete set of photographs of the Scrolls and given them to Huntington for safekeeping in case of a war. Moffett saw that he had an opportunity and, after giving the matter some thought, announced that he had decided to make all of the photographs available to scholars at large. With that simple decision, the monopoly in effect collapsed. The New York Times reported that the Oxford group had reacted with anger and that legal action was being contemplated. This idea, however, was quickly abandoned. Instead, Oxford hastened its own publication of the scrolls by a select group of Qumran-Essene ideologues, and museum exhibits started to take place — of which the San Diego exhibit is only the latest and the largest to date. <BR><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;*<BR><BR>Let us now return to the exhibit and to our Christian fundamentalist theme. As I have reported in other pieces on this site, Dr. <B>Risa Levitt Kohn</B>, Freedman's student, was appointed curator. While the museum was gathering six million dollars from various wealthy philanthropists, she began to put together the exhibit and its accompanying lecture series, from which the many scholars who disagree with the traditional Qumran-Essene theory were carefully excluded ("<A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.nowpublic.com/node/525806" target=_blank mce_href="/node/525806">you don't want to confuse people</A>," she said). In January, she <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.nowpublic.com/node/539186" target=_blank mce_href="/node/539186">falsely presented herself</A> in writing as a "Dead Sea Scrolls scholar."<BR><BR>At the same time, Dr. Kohn announced that the exhibit would feature the above-mentioned "virtual reality" film on Qumran (I discussed the <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.nowpublic.com/node/552993" target=_blank mce_href="/node/552993">sensationalist press campaign</A> surrounding this film at length in an earlier item). It has since come out that the museum and Stephen Spielberg's Righteous Persons Foundation together gave $100,000 dollars to <B>Robert Cargill</B>, a graduate student at UCLA, to further his "dissertation work" involving this film. Cargill is a student of Dr. <B>William Schniedewind</B>, who as we saw above (1) received his M.A. from the Institute of Holy Land Studies and (2) is a member of the board of advisors of the University of the Holy Land.<BR><BR>Now what brought Robert Cargill to Dr. Schniedewind and UCLA? A clue is to be found in Cargill's <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:IsraelXKV8R" target=_blank mce_href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:IsraelXKV8R">biography</A> which he recently posted on his wikipedia "userpage" after initially attempting to post an encyclopedia article about himself — an action blocked by wiki editors. Here, we learn that before enrolling at UCLA, Cargill attended <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.pepperdine.edu/welcome/about/faith.htm" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.pepperdine.edu/welcome/about/faith.htm"><B>Pepperdine University</B></A>, where he received a Master of Science degree in Christian Ministry and a Master of Divinity degree as well. For readers who may be unfamiliar with Pepperdine, it defines itself as a "Christian university," and its website explains that it is "religiously affiliated with the <B><A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Churches_of_Christ#Restoration_Movement" target=_blank mce_href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Churches_of_Christ#Restoration_Movement">Churches of Christ</A></B>, of which Mr. Pepperdine, university founder, was a lifelong member." (Members of the "Churches of Christ" seek to reestablish or "re-present" the <B>original first-century Church</B>, i.e., they "regard early Christian behavior recorded in the New Testament as directives, <B>to be followed literally</B> <B>as mandatory practice</B> today.")<BR><BR>In passing, let us note that another sensationalist Dead Sea Scrolls character who got his M.A. at Pepperdine is <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Tabor" mce_href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Tabor">James Tabor</A> ("he was raised in the Churches of Christ and attended Abilene Christian University where he earned his B.A.," etc.). Tabor is the Charlotte, North Carolina-based religion professor who attempted to demonstrate that undatable feces found at some distance from the Qumran fortress are the remains of an "<A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.forward.com/article/10107/" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.forward.com/article/10107/">Essene toilet</A>." Tabor, incidentally, is also the main figure behind the phony "Lost Tomb of Jesus" claim made in a Discovery Channel "documentary" a few months ago. One of the first of the current series of scroll exhibits took place in... Charlotte, North Carolina. At the time, Tabor falsely presented himself as an "archaeologist" in an article he contributed to a Charlotte newspaper. His "toilet" research was conducted jointly with Joe Zias of the "<B><A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.jibe-edu.org/templates/cusjibe/details.asp?id=28237&amp;PID=171065" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.jibe-edu.org/templates/cusjibe/details.asp?id=28237&amp;PID=171065">Jerusalem Institute for Biblical Exploration</A></B>" (which despite its name is another Christian fundamentalist outfit, located in Humboldt, Tennessee). Zias is said to have held a curatorial position at the Rockefeller Museum in Jerusalem and is occasionally referred to as "Dr. Joe Zias," but I was unable to locate any information on where he may (or may not) have received a degree.<BR><BR>Given everything I've said, it is not surprising to learn that Robert Cargill's work-product, the "virtual reality" film being show at the San Diego exhibit, is featured as one of the <B><A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.uhl.ac/projects.html" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.uhl.ac/projects.html">University of the Holy Land projects</A></B> on that institution's website, immediately following the "Nazareth Village" project.<BR><BR>The same "University of the Holy Land" website explains that "in studying the Dead Sea Scrolls, scholars are presented with the rare opportunity of exploring the world of ... the Essenes ... The Scrolls themselves are the library of the Essenes and reflect their history, beliefs, practices, liturgies, and Biblical interpretation. The site of Qumran near the Dead Sea was the community center of the Essenes..."<BR><BR>What the website fails to mention, of course, is that a team of major Israeli archaeologists led by Dr. <B>Yitzhak Magen</B> and Dr. <B>Yuval Peleg</B>, after a decade spent reexamining the Qumran site, have, like <B>Yizhar Hirschfeld</B> and other scholars before them, concluded that no Essenes ever lived there and that the scrolls were brought down for hiding from Jerusalem during the revolt against Rome and were written by many different groups within ancient Judaism. And, of course, it fails to mention, for example, that Dr. <B>Rachel Elior</B> who chairs the Department of Jewish Thought at the Hebrew University has reached the same Jerusalem conclusion on textual and historical grounds. <BR><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;*<BR><BR>At least one of the sensationalist news articles surrounding the San Diego exhibit has <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.jewishjournal.com/home/preview.php?id=17788" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.jewishjournal.com/home/preview.php?id=17788">celebrated the fact</A> that Dr. Schniedewind of UCLA and his student Robert Cargill are both "practicing Christians," as the article puts it, "with a deep appreciation of Judaism and Israel." Given what is now known about the organizations these two individuals are tied to (see again the obvious fundamentalist agenda of the "Institute of Holy Land Studies" where Schniedewind got his M.A., quoted above), the question must be raised: is the UCLA team's fascination with both Judaism and the Dead Sea Scrolls in any way grounded in a desire to "re-present the original first-century Church"?<BR><BR>In addition, bearing in mind the important apocalyptic themes found in some of the Scrolls, clarification is needed on the attitude of the organizations in question towards the belief, broadly shared by Christian fundamentalists, that the Jews must convert to Christianity before the "end of days" can arrive.<BR><BR>At any rate, the apparent connection between Christian fundamentalist institutions and Israeli scholarship is, to say the least, disconcerting. Ultimately, the question must also be raised — and will hopefully be answered in the coming months and years — whether these institutions have been offering financial backing and related support to any of the scholars involved.<BR><BR>Furthermore, is it proper for museums claiming scientific objectivity to sponsor exhibits significantly informed by fundamentalist beliefs? In fact, did the San Diego Natural History Museum even know that these various Christian organizations — all of which seem to be so oddly connected among themselves — were, together with members of the original Dead Sea Scrolls monopoly, behind the exhibit that Risa Levitt Kohn and Weston Fields pitched to them?<BR><BR>Did they know that Kohn would collaborate with Fields to exclude a series of major Israeli archaeologists from the exhibit, as well as all the other opponents of the old monopolists — including, above all, Jewish historian <B>Norman Golb</B> who has argued (see his <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.forward.com/article/10497/" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.forward.com/article/10497/">Forward editorial</A>) that, on account of the Qumran-Essene theory popularized by Dominican priest Father Roland de Vaux, the "complex history of the Palestinian Jews on the eve of the First Revolt is being pushed aside in favor of a bizarre, Christologically colored thesis"?<BR><BR>Did <B>Joan and Irwin Jacobs</B>, <B>Stephen Spielberg</B> and other famous donors know that of the millions of dollars they agreed to give for the exhibit, some would be handed over to graduate student (and Minister) Robert Cargill for a project that would be featured on the "University of the Holy Land" website; some would fund the "continuing research" of the old crew of Dead Sea Scrolls monopolists; and some would perhaps pad the pockets of the monopolists' other "righteous," i.e., fundamentalist collaborators? Would the donors have been so quick to shell out the money if they had known exactly who was asking for it?<BR><BR>Who's to say. Where interests coincide, even Oxford University professors and Jewish researchers like Emmanuel Tov will work together with Christian fundamentalists like Fields to achieve common goals. The result is the "inner circle," the chain of connected figures — heirs of the old Dead Sea Scrolls monopoly — who are now using the San Diego exhibit to indocrinate thousands of people into believing that the Scrolls are the "library of the Essenes of Qumran."<BR><BR>[<B>August 9 update</B>: I wish to thank Mr. Robert Dworkin for directing my attention to the statement, in an <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://web.israelinsider.com/bin/en.jsp?enPage=ArticlePage&amp;enDisplay=view&amp;enDispWhat=object&amp;enDispWho=Article%5El3983&amp;enZone=Culture&amp;enVersion=0&amp;" target=_blank mce_href="http://web.israelinsider.com/bin/en.jsp?enPage=ArticlePage&amp;enDisplay=view&amp;enDispWhat=object&amp;enDispWho=Article%5El3983&amp;enZone=Culture&amp;enVersion=0&amp;">article</A> published nearly three years ago to this date, that "archaeologists who are financed by Christian fundamentalist organizations" had, on August 16, 2004, given a "press conference" to reassert, in the face of research to the contrary, that Qumran was a "monastery" inhabited by a sect or "community," etc.  Although the article does not state the names of these individuals, <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.nowpublic.com/node/582470/edit/www.worldofthebible.com/Documents/SpecialOnlineReport.pdf" target=_blank mce_href="www.worldofthebible.com/Documents/SpecialOnlineReport.pdf">other news items</A> reveal that at least one of them was <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Randall_Price" target=_blank mce_href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Randall_Price">Randall Price</A>, Th.M., Ph.D., president of the <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.worldofthebible.com/" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.worldofthebible.com/">World of Bible Ministries</A>, pastor at "Grace Bible Church" in St. Marcos, Texas (no website found) and "research professor" at the "Oregon Theological Seminary" (website suspended) and also at the thriving <A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.trinitysouthwest.com/#/About_TSU/" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.trinitysouthwest.com/#/About_TSU/">Trinity Southwest University</A> (TSU), an institution based in Albuquerque, New Mexico.  </SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">TSU defines itself as a "trans-denominational institution in the evangelical mainstream ... serving New Mexico's Christian community." Its statement adds: "<STRONG>However</STRONG>, we view creedal formulations and statements of faith [that go] beyond the Bible itself, as grids that relegate the Word of God to patient status, rather than its proper role as agent in our lives."  TSU's affiliations include the "Association of Christian Schools International" (dead link on TSU's site) and the "International Symposium on Archaeology and the Bible" (<A class=tinyMCE-body href="http://www.abqsymposium.org/" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.abqsymposium.org/">link</A> provided by TSU goes to Bible products and trivia site).  </SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">As of today, I have been unable to ascertain which other "archaeologists" were present at the "press conference" of August 16, 2004.  The Dead Sea Scrolls exhibit recently held in Kansas City is said to have featured a seven-minute film that begins with a slideshow of quotes from various authors including Dr. Price, the famous James Tabor, and Stephen Hodge, otherwise known as an expert on Zen Buddhism.]<BR><BR>[<STRONG>August 31 update</STRONG>: recent news reports indicate the goverment is prosecuting the <STRONG>Holy Land Foundation</STRONG> for allegedly funneling money to Islamic terrorists. We can of course safely assume that this Texas-based "charitable" entity is entirely unrelated to the evangelical "Holy Land" institutions discussed above; but the event serves to remind us of the type of fundamentalist ideological motivations at work among individuals who choose such names for their organizations, and raises a serious question as to the judgment of someone who, having received a Ph.D. from Brandeis University, would agree to serve on the Board of Advisors of such an institution.<BR><BR>Brandeis (Ph.D.)/Jerusalem University College (M.A.) alumnus William Schniedewind is surely aware of the little problem entailed by this kind of arguably schizoid behavior, for he casually <STRONG>omits any mention </STRONG>of his advisory role at the University of the Holy Land on his UCLA faculty page, while providing what appears to be an exhaustive list of the other, less controversial, positions that he holds. Silence speaks a thousand words.  As I mentioned in one of my earlier items, Schniedewind wrote his Brandeis dissertation on “Prophets, Prophecy, and Inspiration in the Book of Chronicles” — a very cute title, but hardly grounds for presenting oneself as an authority on ancient Hebrew manuscripts and the archaeology of Khirbet Qumran.]<BR><BR>[<STRONG>September 17 update</STRONG>: During the past few days I have discovered further information, contained in the following paragraphs, on the network of Christian evangelist "bible scholars" in Jerusalem.]<BR><BR> Not surprisingly, it turns out that Weston Fields is also a member of the <a href="http://www.js.org/">Jerusalem School of Synoptic Research</a>, a "think tank made up of Jewish and Christian scholars dedicated to better understanding the Synoptic Gospels." The director of this "school" is <a href="http://www.jerusalemperspective.com/default.aspx?tabid=32">David Bivin</a>, a "native of Cleveland, Oklahoma" who has lived in Israel since 1963, studying for a long time with various scholars at the Hebrew University and ("for many years") also "privately" with "scholar-pastor" <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_L._Lindsey">Robert Lindsey</a> (Bivin, we are told, met his wife when she was an employee of Baptist House, "the office of Jerusalem's seventeen-member Narkis Street Baptist Church where Dr. Robert Lindsey was the pastor"). Bivin at one time directed a department at the... <strong>Institute of Holy Land Studies</strong>. He is the co-author, with Roy Blizzard, Jr. (also originally from Oklahoma), of <em>Understanding the Difficult Words of Jesus</em>, and the publisher of <a href="http://www.jerusalemperspective.com/Default.aspx?tabid=35"><em>Jerusalem Perspective</em></a>, a "unique, Jerusalem-based" website that presents "the life and teachings of Jesus in their original cultural and linguistic settings." The website features, among other writings, a series of articles that dogmatically preach the Qumran-Essene theory of the origins of the Dead Sea Scrolls. One of them is a diatribe by Mr. <strong>Magen Broshi</strong>, a fierce defender of that theory who, even though he never received a Ph.D., is frequently cited and presented as an authority on the Scrolls in popular magazines and television "documentaries" on Qumran. Another article, by someone named Stephen Schmidt (no info found) describes the "beliefs, literature and men of the Essene community" as a "vital part of the fabric of Jesus’ world." The website, it goes almost without saying, does not mention (let alone discuss) the research conclusions of the various historians and archaeologists who, during the past decade, have rejected the Qumran-Essene theory.<BR><BR><em>Jerusalem Perspective</em> is "registered in Israel as a <strong>small business</strong>, and in the United States as a <strong>non-profit</strong> organization." It is directed and solely-owned by David Bivin and his wife Josa, "Christians who have lived in Israel since 1963 and 1966, respectively."<BR><BR>Another "educational institution" that apparently plays a role in indoctrinating young Christians into an unquestioning belief in the Qumran-Essene theory, is the <a href="http://www.masters.edu/DeptPageNew.asp?PageID=58">Master's College for Christ and Scripture</a>. Based in Santa Clarita, California, it has an "Israel Bible Extension Program" in the Jerusalem "vicinity" (no specific address is given). Its <a href="http://www.masters.edu/DeptPageNew.asp?PageID=61">doctrinal statement</a> includes a portion on the "Second Coming and the Millennial Reign," where we read that on account of "disobedience ... Israel was temporarily set aside ... but will again be awakened through repentance [i.e., conversion of the Jews to Christianity] to enter into the land of blessing." The college's team in Israel includes, for example, Mr. <a href="http://www.masters.edu/academics/profiles.asp?depname=94">Todd Bolen</a>, who received an M.A. from the... <strong>Institute of Holy Land Studies</strong> and an M.Div. from the college's seminary (which "exists to advance the kingdom of the Lord Jesus Christ by equipping godly men to be pastors," etc.). Mr. Bolen's "teaching focus is in biblical history and archaeology," and he "enjoy[s] especially the opportunity to lead students on hikes and camping trips," but he is currently on "study leave" in Plano, Texas. Through the <a href="http://christian-book-store.christiansunite.com/Software/Church%7CBible-History/">Christianbook.com</a> website, he markets cd-roms featuring photographs of "Bible Lands," advertised as "perfect for worship, class study, or personal Bible study."  The same company also markets a product entitled "Qumran Sectarian Manuscripts on CD-ROM" (no info on author available).</SPAN></P></p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dead Sea Scrolls exhibit misleads public?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dead_sea_scrolls_controversy.sandiegoblogs.com/archives/000469.html" />
    <modified>2007-07-09T17:49:07Z</modified>
    <issued>2007-07-09T13:49:07-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:,2007:/25.469</id>
    <created>2007-07-09T17:49:07Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> The Los Angeles Times recently carried an interesting report by Mike Boehm, on the Dead Sea Scrolls exhibit taking place at the San Diego Natural History Museum. They asked the curator, Dr. Risa Levitt Kohn, why the museum has...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Charles Gadda</name>
      
      <email>carlogadda@yahoo.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://dead_sea_scrolls_controversy.sandiegoblogs.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img alt="DeadSeaScroll[1].jpg" src="http://dead_sea_scrolls_controversy.sandiegoblogs.com/DeadSeaScroll[1].jpg" width="250" height="319" border="0" /></p>

<p>The Los Angeles Times recently carried an <a href="http://www.topix.net/content/trb/2007/06/a-lively-debate-over-the-dead-sea-scrolls">interesting report</a> by Mike Boehm, on the Dead Sea Scrolls exhibit taking place at the San Diego Natural History Museum.  They asked the curator, Dr. Risa Levitt Kohn, why the museum has carefully excluded all scholars who oppose the old, and increasingly contested, theory of Scroll origins from the lecture series accompanying the exhibit, and she came up with a good reply--"You don't want to confuse people with so many competing theories, so they walk away, saying, 'Well, nobody really knows anything!'"</p>

<p>I for one find that extremely convincing.  The last thing in the world we would want is for people to understand <strong>why </strong>there is more than one interpretation of the facts. After all, that would only <em>confuse </em>them, and in their confused state they might become depressed, or behave in an irrational manner. They might even start asking <strong>why </strong>the museum has not explained <strong>how </strong>it came about that an entire series of major scholars rejected the old theory over the past decade, not in favor of "so many competing theories," but in favor of one salient competing theory. Yes, we must protect people from the truth at all costs.  Besides, we wouldn't want to do anything that might upset Dr. Kohn's academic friends! </p>

<p>For a somewhat different perspective, see University of Chicago historian Norman Golb's article <a href="http://www.oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/dss_fact_fiction_2007.pdf">Fact and Fiction in Current Exhibitions of the Dead Sea Scrolls--A Critical Notebook for Viewers</a>.  And see his editorial in The Forward, <a href="http://www.forward.com/articles/10497/">Take Claims about Dead Sea Scrolls with a Grain of Salt</a>.  (The titles are links--clicking on them brings up the articles.) </p>

<p>A chronology of this controversy is now <a href="http://museum-ethics.blogspot.com/2007/06/chronology-of-dead-sea-scrolls.html">available on-line</a> (that's another link).  I've posted a picture of the Copper Scroll, easily the most important document found in the caves--and which the museum appropriately treats as a "mystery" because to explain its significance for the interpretation of the scrolls as a whole would also <em>confuse the public</em>.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>
